Under that standard, it could no longer defend the constitutionality of DOMA Section 3.
On April 18, 2011, Paul Clement, representing the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the House of Representatives (BLAG), filed a motion asking to be allowed to intervene in the suit "for the limited purpose of defending the constitutionality of Section III" of DOMA.
If you are single or bi-curious and are fancying a threesome or something a little different then again you will find yourself well catered for, it really doesn’t matter what your sexual desire is we know that there will be someone suited to you who has already joined.
Once you are behind the member’s area you will be spoilt for choice when it comes to finding yourself an ideal sex date.
Jones ruled that a rational basis review of Section 3 of DOMA showed it to be unconstitutional, as it violated plaintiff's rights under the equal protection guarantees of the Fifth Amendment, and ordered that Windsor receive the tax refund due to her.